rudderstackvsTypst
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| rudderstack | Typst | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 3 in Customer Data Platform | #1 of 2 in Publishing |
| GitHub stars | 4 508 | 56 870 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +20 | +141 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 39 | 5 |
| Latest release | v1.92.1 · 28 Oct 2026 | v0.15.1 · 17 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Typst scores 82/100 against 64/100 for rudderstack, so it is the safer default.
rudderstack ships more often: 39 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Typst.
If you want the quickest setup, Typst is easier to run; rudderstack needs more configuration.
Typst is growing faster right now (+141 stars in 30 days).
rudderstack details →Typst details →
Swap a project
Keep rudderstack, compare it with
Keep Typst, compare it with