BentoPDFvsquackback
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| BentoPDF | quackback | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Document Processing | #9 of 14 in Customer Support |
| GitHub stars | 16 188 | 331 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +477 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 15 |
| Latest release | v2.8.10 · 19 Oct 2026 | v0.14.1 · 7 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
BentoPDF scores 77/100 against 50/100 for quackback, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, BentoPDF is easier to run; quackback needs more configuration.
BentoPDF is growing faster right now (+477 stars in 30 days).
BentoPDF details →quackback details →
Swap a project
Keep BentoPDF, compare it with
Keep quackback, compare it with