BentoPDFvsqm-music
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| BentoPDF | qm-music | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Document Processing | #20 of 59 in Music Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 16 181 | 588 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +482 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 11 |
| Latest release | v2.8.10 · 19 Oct 2026 | v2.5.0 · 10 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Java |
Which one should you pick?
BentoPDF scores 77/100 against 51/100 for qm-music, so it is the safer default.
BentoPDF ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for qm-music.
BentoPDF is growing faster right now (+482 stars in 30 days).
BentoPDF details →qm-music details →
Swap a project
Keep BentoPDF, compare it with
Keep qm-music, compare it with