PaddleOCRvsqm-music
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| PaddleOCR | qm-music | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 4 in OCR | #20 of 59 in Music Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 91 881 | 588 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +440 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 11 |
| Latest release | v3.7.0 · 11 Jun 2026 | v2.5.0 · 10 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Java |
Which one should you pick?
PaddleOCR scores 85/100 against 51/100 for qm-music, so it is the safer default.
qm-music ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for PaddleOCR.
If you want the quickest setup, qm-music is easier to run; PaddleOCR needs more configuration.
PaddleOCR is growing faster right now (+440 stars in 30 days).
PaddleOCR details →qm-music details →
Swap a project
Keep PaddleOCR, compare it with
Keep qm-music, compare it with