BentoPDFvsOperant
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| BentoPDF | Operant | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Document Processing | #169 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 16 188 | 446 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +477 | +-1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 1 |
| Latest release | v2.8.10 · 19 Oct 2026 | desktop-candidate-2026-09-28-08e65ea · 28 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
BentoPDF scores 77/100 against 39/100 for Operant, so it is the safer default.
BentoPDF ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Operant.
If you want the quickest setup, BentoPDF is easier to run; Operant needs more configuration.
BentoPDF is growing faster right now (+477 stars in 30 days).
BentoPDF details →Operant details →
Swap a project
Keep BentoPDF, compare it with
Keep Operant, compare it with