OperantvsTypst
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Operant | Typst | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 39/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #169 of 209 in AI Agents | #1 of 2 in Publishing |
| GitHub stars | 446 | 56 876 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +-1 | +147 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 5 |
| Latest release | desktop-candidate-2026-09-28-08e65ea · 28 Sept 2026 | v0.15.1 · 17 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Typst scores 82/100 against 39/100 for Operant, so it is the safer default.
Typst ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Operant.
If you want the quickest setup, Typst is easier to run; Operant needs more configuration.
Typst is growing faster right now (+147 stars in 30 days).
Operant details →Typst details →