BentoPDFvsOpenDesign
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| BentoPDF | OpenDesign | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Document Processing | #1 of 7 in Design |
| GitHub stars | 16 188 | 104 697 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +477 | +1 866 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 10 |
| Latest release | v2.8.10 · 19 Oct 2026 | open-design-v0.26.1 · 22 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
OpenDesign scores 83/100 against 77/100 for BentoPDF, so it is the safer default.
BentoPDF ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for OpenDesign.
If you want the quickest setup, BentoPDF is easier to run; OpenDesign needs more configuration.
OpenDesign is growing faster right now (+1 866 stars in 30 days).
BentoPDF details →OpenDesign details →
Swap a project
Keep BentoPDF, compare it with
Keep OpenDesign, compare it with