BentoPDFvsOctoBot
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| BentoPDF | OctoBot | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Document Processing | #6 of 42 in Cryptocurrency |
| GitHub stars | 16 190 | 6 873 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +479 | +258 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 5 |
| Latest release | v2.8.10 · 19 Oct 2026 | 2.1.1 · 30 Mar 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
BentoPDF scores 77/100 against 69/100 for OctoBot, so it is the safer default.
BentoPDF ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for OctoBot.
If you want the quickest setup, BentoPDF is easier to run; OctoBot needs more configuration.
BentoPDF details →OctoBot details →
Swap a project
Keep BentoPDF, compare it with
Keep OctoBot, compare it with