OctoBotvsTypst
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OctoBot | Typst | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 42 in Cryptocurrency | #1 of 2 in Publishing |
| GitHub stars | 6 872 | 56 874 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +257 | +145 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 5 |
| Latest release | 2.1.1 · 30 Mar 2026 | v0.15.1 · 17 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Typst scores 82/100 against 69/100 for OctoBot, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, Typst is easier to run; OctoBot needs more configuration.
OctoBot details →Typst details →
Swap a project
Keep OctoBot, compare it with
Keep Typst, compare it with