BentoPDFvsnetxms
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| BentoPDF | netxms | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Document Processing | #19 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 16 190 | 417 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +479 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 15 |
| Latest release | v2.8.10 · 19 Oct 2026 | release-6.2.4 · 2 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | JavaScript | C++ |
Which one should you pick?
BentoPDF scores 77/100 against 55/100 for netxms, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, BentoPDF is easier to run; netxms needs more configuration.
BentoPDF is growing faster right now (+479 stars in 30 days).
BentoPDF details →netxms details →
Swap a project
Keep BentoPDF, compare it with
Keep netxms, compare it with