BentoPDFvsLiquidsoap
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| BentoPDF | Liquidsoap | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Document Processing | #8 of 54 in Media Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 16 190 | 1 743 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +479 | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 9 |
| Latest release | v2.8.10 · 19 Oct 2026 | rolling-release-v2.5.x · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | OCaml |
Which one should you pick?
BentoPDF scores 77/100 against 62/100 for Liquidsoap, so it is the safer default.
BentoPDF ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Liquidsoap.
If you want the quickest setup, BentoPDF is easier to run; Liquidsoap needs more configuration.
BentoPDF is growing faster right now (+479 stars in 30 days).
BentoPDF details →Liquidsoap details →
Swap a project
Keep BentoPDF, compare it with
Keep Liquidsoap, compare it with