LiquidsoapvsTypst
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Liquidsoap | Typst | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 62/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 54 in Media Streaming | #1 of 2 in Publishing |
| GitHub stars | 1 743 | 56 878 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +149 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 5 |
| Latest release | rolling-release-v2.5.x · 28 Oct 2026 | v0.15.1 · 17 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | OCaml | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Typst scores 82/100 against 62/100 for Liquidsoap, so it is the safer default.
Liquidsoap ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Typst.
If you want the quickest setup, Typst is easier to run; Liquidsoap needs more configuration.
Typst is growing faster right now (+149 stars in 30 days).
Liquidsoap details →Typst details →
Swap a project
Keep Liquidsoap, compare it with
Keep Typst, compare it with