BentoPDFvslangflow
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| BentoPDF | langflow | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 90/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Document Processing | #2 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 16 180 | 156 115 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +481 | +924 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 20 |
| Latest release | v2.8.10 · 19 Oct 2026 | v1.12.8 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
langflow scores 90/100 against 77/100 for BentoPDF, so it is the safer default.
langflow ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for BentoPDF.
If you want the quickest setup, BentoPDF is easier to run; langflow needs more configuration.
BentoPDF details →langflow details →
Swap a project
Keep BentoPDF, compare it with
Keep langflow, compare it with