beamvsWindows ARM
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| beam | Windows ARM | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #29 of 125 in AI | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 1 834 | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +47 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 364 | 10 |
| Latest release | gateway-0.1.837 · 26 Oct 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Batchfile |
Which one should you pick?
beam and Windows ARM score the same (61/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.
beam ships more often: 364 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Windows ARM.
beam is growing faster right now (+47 stars in 30 days).
beam details →Windows ARM details →
Swap a project
Keep beam, compare it with
Keep Windows ARM, compare it with