beamvsTypst
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| beam | Typst | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #29 of 125 in AI | #1 of 2 in Publishing |
| GitHub stars | 1 834 | 56 869 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +47 | +140 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 364 | 5 |
| Latest release | gateway-0.1.837 · 26 Oct 2026 | v0.15.1 · 17 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Typst scores 82/100 against 61/100 for beam, so it is the safer default.
beam ships more often: 364 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Typst.
If you want the quickest setup, Typst is easier to run; beam needs more configuration.
Typst is growing faster right now (+140 stars in 30 days).
Swap a project
Keep beam, compare it with
Keep Typst, compare it with