beamvsApache Tika
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| beam | Apache Tika | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 60/100 | 68/100 |
| Rank in category | #31 of 124 in AI | #1 of 2 in Data Extraction |
| GitHub stars | 1 834 | 4 115 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +47 | +16 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 364 | 0 |
| Latest release | gateway-0.1.837 · 26 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Java |
Which one should you pick?
Apache Tika scores 68/100 against 60/100 for beam, so it is the safer default.
beam ships more often: 364 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Apache Tika.
If you want the quickest setup, Apache Tika is easier to run; beam needs more configuration.
beam is growing faster right now (+47 stars in 30 days).
beam details →Apache Tika details →
Swap a project
Keep beam, compare it with
Keep Apache Tika, compare it with