beamvsSRS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| beam | SRS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 60/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #31 of 124 in AI | #4 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 1 834 | 29 390 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +47 | +111 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 364 | 13 |
| Latest release | gateway-0.1.837 · 26 Oct 2026 | v7.0-a3 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | C |
Which one should you pick?
SRS scores 78/100 against 60/100 for beam, so it is the safer default.
beam ships more often: 364 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for SRS.
If you want the quickest setup, SRS is easier to run; beam needs more configuration.
SRS is growing faster right now (+111 stars in 30 days).
Swap a project
Keep beam, compare it with
Keep SRS, compare it with