beamvsPostgREST
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| beam | PostgREST | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 | 79/100 |
| Rank in category | #29 of 125 in AI | #2 of 13 in API |
| GitHub stars | 1 834 | 27 733 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +47 | +55 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 364 | 20 |
| Latest release | gateway-0.1.837 · 26 Oct 2026 | v16.5 · 18 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Haskell |
Which one should you pick?
PostgREST scores 79/100 against 61/100 for beam, so it is the safer default.
beam ships more often: 364 stable releases in the past year, against 20 for PostgREST.
If you want the quickest setup, PostgREST is easier to run; beam needs more configuration.
beam details →PostgREST details →
Swap a project
Keep beam, compare it with
Keep PostgREST, compare it with