beamvsPhotoPrism
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| beam | PhotoPrism | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 60/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #31 of 125 in AI | #4 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 1 834 | 40 373 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +47 | +138 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 364 | 7 |
| Latest release | gateway-0.1.837 · 26 Oct 2026 | 261007-65faaae5d · 7 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Go | Go |
Which one should you pick?
PhotoPrism scores 76/100 against 60/100 for beam, so it is the safer default.
beam ships more often: 364 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for PhotoPrism.
If you want the quickest setup, PhotoPrism is easier to run; beam needs more configuration.
PhotoPrism is growing faster right now (+138 stars in 30 days).
beam details →PhotoPrism details →
Swap a project
Keep beam, compare it with
Keep PhotoPrism, compare it with