beamvsfalco
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| beam | falco | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 60/100 | 74/100 |
| Rank in category | #31 of 125 in AI | #12 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 1 834 | 9 535 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +47 | +125 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 364 | 6 |
| Latest release | gateway-0.1.837 · 26 Oct 2026 | 0.45.1 · 19 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | C |
Which one should you pick?
falco scores 74/100 against 60/100 for beam, so it is the safer default.
beam ships more often: 364 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for falco.
If you want the quickest setup, falco is easier to run; beam needs more configuration.
falco is growing faster right now (+125 stars in 30 days).
Swap a project
Keep beam, compare it with
Keep falco, compare it with