BackstagevsTube Archivist
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Backstage | Tube Archivist | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 166 in Developer Tools | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 34 739 | 8 552 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +57 | +83 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 | 6 |
| Latest release | v1.57.0-next.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Backstage scores 79/100 against 72/100 for Tube Archivist, so it is the safer default.
Backstage ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tube Archivist.
Backstage details →Tube Archivist details →