SRSvsurl-to-png
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| SRS | url-to-png | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 118 in Media Server | #13 of 16 in Web Scraping |
| GitHub stars | 29 390 | 256 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +113 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 2 |
| Latest release | v7.0-a3 · 25 Oct 2026 | v2.1.4 · 18 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | C | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
SRS scores 78/100 against 49/100 for url-to-png, so it is the safer default.
SRS ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for url-to-png.
If you want the quickest setup, url-to-png is easier to run; SRS needs more configuration.
SRS is growing faster right now (+113 stars in 30 days).
SRS details →url-to-png details →
Swap a project
Keep SRS, compare it with
Keep url-to-png, compare it with