autoxposevsNginx Proxy Manager
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| autoxpose | Nginx Proxy Manager | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 43/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #25 of 34 in Network Management | #2 of 24 in Reverse Proxy |
| GitHub stars | 149 | 34 564 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +350 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 11 |
| Latest release | v0.6.0 · 8 Oct 2026 | v2.16.0 · 24 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Nginx Proxy Manager scores 82/100 against 43/100 for autoxpose, so it is the safer default.
Nginx Proxy Manager ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for autoxpose.
If you want the quickest setup, Nginx Proxy Manager is easier to run; autoxpose needs more configuration.
Nginx Proxy Manager is growing faster right now (+350 stars in 30 days).
autoxpose details →Nginx Proxy Manager details →
Swap a project
Keep autoxpose, compare it with
Keep Nginx Proxy Manager, compare it with