automatic-ripping-machinevsZabbix
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| automatic-ripping-machine | Zabbix | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 142 in Media Management | #13 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 5 392 | 6 522 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +148 | +110 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 0 |
| Latest release | 2.24.4 · 3 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go Template |
Which one should you pick?
Zabbix scores 75/100 against 67/100 for automatic-ripping-machine, so it is the safer default.
automatic-ripping-machine ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zabbix.
If you want the quickest setup, automatic-ripping-machine is easier to run; Zabbix needs more configuration.
automatic-ripping-machine details →Zabbix details →