automatic-ripping-machinevsWorkout.cool
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| automatic-ripping-machine | Workout.cool | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 142 in Media Management | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 5 392 | 8 654 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +148 | +155 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 1 |
| Latest release | 2.24.4 · 3 Oct 2026 | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
automatic-ripping-machine scores 67/100 against 66/100 for Workout.cool, so it is the safer default.
automatic-ripping-machine ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Workout.cool.
If you want the quickest setup, Workout.cool is easier to run; automatic-ripping-machine needs more configuration.
automatic-ripping-machine details →Workout.cool details →