automatic-ripping-machinevsverdaccio
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| automatic-ripping-machine | verdaccio | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 142 in Media Management | #1 of 11 in Package Management |
| GitHub stars | 5 391 | 17 956 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +147 | +57 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 29 |
| Latest release | 2.24.4 · 3 Oct 2026 | v7.0.2 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
verdaccio scores 76/100 against 67/100 for automatic-ripping-machine, so it is the safer default.
verdaccio ships more often: 29 stable releases in the past year, against 16 for automatic-ripping-machine.
If you want the quickest setup, verdaccio is easier to run; automatic-ripping-machine needs more configuration.
automatic-ripping-machine is growing faster right now (+147 stars in 30 days).
automatic-ripping-machine details →verdaccio details →