automatic-ripping-machinevsTypst
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| automatic-ripping-machine | Typst | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 142 in Media Management | #1 of 2 in Publishing |
| GitHub stars | 5 391 | 56 870 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +147 | +141 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 5 |
| Latest release | 2.24.4 · 3 Oct 2026 | v0.15.1 · 17 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Typst scores 82/100 against 67/100 for automatic-ripping-machine, so it is the safer default.
automatic-ripping-machine ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Typst.
If you want the quickest setup, Typst is easier to run; automatic-ripping-machine needs more configuration.
automatic-ripping-machine details →Typst details →