automatic-ripping-machinevsSRS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| automatic-ripping-machine | SRS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 142 in Media Management | #4 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 5 392 | 29 391 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +148 | +112 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 13 |
| Latest release | 2.24.4 · 3 Oct 2026 | v7.0-a3 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | C |
Which one should you pick?
SRS scores 78/100 against 67/100 for automatic-ripping-machine, so it is the safer default.
automatic-ripping-machine ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for SRS.
automatic-ripping-machine details →SRS details →