automatic-ripping-machinevssentry
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| automatic-ripping-machine | sentry | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 80/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 142 in Media Management | #1 of 9 in Application Performance Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 5 392 | 45 679 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +148 | +840 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 22 |
| Latest release | 2.24.4 · 3 Oct 2026 | 26.10.1 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
sentry scores 80/100 against 67/100 for automatic-ripping-machine, so it is the safer default.
sentry ships more often: 22 stable releases in the past year, against 16 for automatic-ripping-machine.
If you want the quickest setup, automatic-ripping-machine is easier to run; sentry needs more configuration.
sentry is growing faster right now (+840 stars in 30 days).
automatic-ripping-machine details →sentry details →