automatic-ripping-machinevsrsyslog
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| automatic-ripping-machine | rsyslog | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 67/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 142 in Media Management | #2 of 8 in Logging |
| GitHub stars | 5 392 | 2 344 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +148 | +8 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 4 |
| Latest release | 2.24.4 · 3 Oct 2026 | v8.2610.0 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | LGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | C |
Which one should you pick?
automatic-ripping-machine and rsyslog score the same (67/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.
automatic-ripping-machine ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for rsyslog.
If you want the quickest setup, automatic-ripping-machine is easier to run; rsyslog needs more configuration.
automatic-ripping-machine is growing faster right now (+148 stars in 30 days).
automatic-ripping-machine details →rsyslog details →