automatic-ripping-machinevsopenpencil
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| automatic-ripping-machine | openpencil | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 142 in Media Management | #2 of 7 in Design |
| GitHub stars | 5 389 | 9 387 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +148 | +802 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 14 |
| Latest release | 2.24.4 · 3 Oct 2026 | v0.16.0 · 14 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
openpencil scores 73/100 against 67/100 for automatic-ripping-machine, so it is the safer default.
automatic-ripping-machine ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 14 for openpencil.
If you want the quickest setup, openpencil is easier to run; automatic-ripping-machine needs more configuration.
openpencil is growing faster right now (+802 stars in 30 days).
automatic-ripping-machine details →openpencil details →