automatic-ripping-machinevsMastodon
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| automatic-ripping-machine | Mastodon | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 142 in Media Management | #2 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums |
| GitHub stars | 5 391 | 50 457 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +147 | +137 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 38 |
| Latest release | 2.24.4 · 3 Oct 2026 | v4.4.26 · 1 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
Mastodon scores 82/100 against 67/100 for automatic-ripping-machine, so it is the safer default.
Mastodon ships more often: 38 stable releases in the past year, against 16 for automatic-ripping-machine.
If you want the quickest setup, automatic-ripping-machine is easier to run; Mastodon needs more configuration.
automatic-ripping-machine details →Mastodon details →