automatic-ripping-machinevsLibation
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| automatic-ripping-machine | Libation | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 68/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 142 in Media Management | #2 of 15 in Audiobook Management |
| GitHub stars | 5 389 | 6 375 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +148 | +157 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 33 |
| Latest release | 2.24.4 · 3 Oct 2026 | v14.2.5 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | C |
Which one should you pick?
Libation scores 68/100 against 67/100 for automatic-ripping-machine, so it is the safer default.
Libation ships more often: 33 stable releases in the past year, against 16 for automatic-ripping-machine.
automatic-ripping-machine details →Libation details →