automatic-ripping-machinevsFish Speech
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| automatic-ripping-machine | Fish Speech | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 142 in Media Management | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 5 392 | 33 464 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +148 | +141 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 0 |
| Latest release | 2.24.4 · 3 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Fish Speech scores 73/100 against 67/100 for automatic-ripping-machine, so it is the safer default.
automatic-ripping-machine ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.
If you want the quickest setup, automatic-ripping-machine is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.
automatic-ripping-machine details →Fish Speech details →