AutoGPTvsSnort
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| AutoGPT | Snort | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 209 in AI Agents | #53 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums |
| GitHub stars | 187 808 | 348 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +271 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 4 |
| Latest release | — | v0.5.3 · 8 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
AutoGPT scores 85/100 against 47/100 for Snort, so it is the safer default.
Snort ships more often: 4 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for AutoGPT.
If you want the quickest setup, Snort is easier to run; AutoGPT needs more configuration.
AutoGPT is growing faster right now (+271 stars in 30 days).
AutoGPT details →Snort details →