AutoGPTvsPlausible Analytics
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| AutoGPT | Plausible Analytics | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 209 in AI Agents | #2 of 21 in Web analytics |
| GitHub stars | 187 807 | 29 708 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +270 | +501 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 3 |
| Latest release | — | v3.2.1 · 1 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Elixir |
Which one should you pick?
AutoGPT scores 85/100 against 81/100 for Plausible Analytics, so it is the safer default.
Plausible Analytics ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for AutoGPT.
If you want the quickest setup, Plausible Analytics is easier to run; AutoGPT needs more configuration.
AutoGPT details →Plausible Analytics details →