AutoGPTvsNoEyes
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| AutoGPT | NoEyes | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 | 41/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 209 in AI Agents | #83 of 110 in Chat |
| GitHub stars | 187 805 | 146 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +289 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 4 |
| Latest release | — | v0.5.0 · 28 Mar 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
AutoGPT scores 85/100 against 41/100 for NoEyes, so it is the safer default.
NoEyes ships more often: 4 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for AutoGPT.
If you want the quickest setup, NoEyes is easier to run; AutoGPT needs more configuration.
AutoGPT is growing faster right now (+289 stars in 30 days).
AutoGPT details →NoEyes details →