AutoGPTvsmediastorm
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| AutoGPT | mediastorm | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 209 in AI Agents | #44 of 54 in Media Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 187 810 | 143 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +273 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 19 |
| Latest release | — | androidtv-native-latest · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
AutoGPT scores 85/100 against 45/100 for mediastorm, so it is the safer default.
mediastorm ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for AutoGPT.
If you want the quickest setup, mediastorm is easier to run; AutoGPT needs more configuration.
AutoGPT is growing faster right now (+273 stars in 30 days).
AutoGPT details →mediastorm details →