AutoGPTvsmagic-frame
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| AutoGPT | magic-frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 | 52/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 209 in AI Agents | #58 of 104 in Home Automation |
| GitHub stars | 187 807 | 511 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +270 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 21 |
| Latest release | — | v1.5.10 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
AutoGPT scores 85/100 against 52/100 for magic-frame, so it is the safer default.
magic-frame ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for AutoGPT.
If you want the quickest setup, magic-frame is easier to run; AutoGPT needs more configuration.
AutoGPT is growing faster right now (+270 stars in 30 days).
AutoGPT details →magic-frame details →