AudioMuse-AIvsWorkout.cool
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| AudioMuse-AI | Workout.cool | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 59 in Music Streaming | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 2 826 | 8 654 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +183 | +155 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 38 | 1 |
| Latest release | v3.6.4 · 16 Oct 2026 | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
AudioMuse-AI scores 67/100 against 66/100 for Workout.cool, so it is the safer default.
AudioMuse-AI ships more often: 38 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Workout.cool.
If you want the quickest setup, Workout.cool is easier to run; AudioMuse-AI needs more configuration.
AudioMuse-AI details →Workout.cool details →
Swap a project
Keep AudioMuse-AI, compare it with
Keep Workout.cool, compare it with