Argo CDvsTraffic Source
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Argo CD | Traffic Source | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 28 in CI/CD | #10 of 27 in Analytics |
| GitHub stars | 24 500 | 679 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +264 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 30 | 0 |
| Latest release | v3.3.18 · 22 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
Argo CD scores 81/100 against 51/100 for Traffic Source, so it is the safer default.
Argo CD ships more often: 30 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Traffic Source.
Argo CD is growing faster right now (+264 stars in 30 days).
Argo CD details →Traffic Source details →