Argo CDvsrpi-mqtt-monitor
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Argo CD | rpi-mqtt-monitor | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 28 in CI/CD | #58 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 24 498 | 328 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +273 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 30 | 8 |
| Latest release | v3.3.18 · 22 Oct 2026 | 1.4.3 · 18 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Argo CD scores 81/100 against 51/100 for rpi-mqtt-monitor, so it is the safer default.
Argo CD ships more often: 30 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for rpi-mqtt-monitor.
Argo CD is growing faster right now (+273 stars in 30 days).
Argo CD details →rpi-mqtt-monitor details →