Argo CDvsmitmproxy
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Argo CD | mitmproxy | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 28 in CI/CD | #1 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 24 495 | 46 441 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +270 | +1 306 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 30 | 5 |
| Latest release | v3.3.18 · 22 Oct 2026 | v12.3.1 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
mitmproxy scores 86/100 against 81/100 for Argo CD, so it is the safer default.
Argo CD ships more often: 30 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for mitmproxy.
mitmproxy is growing faster right now (+1 306 stars in 30 days).
Argo CD details →mitmproxy details →