Argo CDvsgitbucket
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Argo CD | gitbucket | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 68/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 28 in CI/CD | #5 of 14 in Code Hosting |
| GitHub stars | 24 498 | 9 418 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +273 | +15 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 30 | 6 |
| Latest release | v3.3.18 · 22 Oct 2026 | 4.48.0 · 20 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Scala |
Which one should you pick?
Argo CD scores 81/100 against 68/100 for gitbucket, so it is the safer default.
Argo CD ships more often: 30 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for gitbucket.
If you want the quickest setup, gitbucket is easier to run; Argo CD needs more configuration.
Argo CD is growing faster right now (+273 stars in 30 days).
Argo CD details →gitbucket details →