Argillavswoodpecker-ci
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Argilla | woodpecker-ci | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 3 in Data Collection | #5 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 5 185 | 8 066 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +64 | +158 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 11 |
| Latest release | — | v3.20.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
woodpecker-ci scores 73/100 against 64/100 for Argilla, so it is the safer default.
woodpecker-ci ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Argilla.
woodpecker-ci is growing faster right now (+158 stars in 30 days).
Argilla details →woodpecker-ci details →
Swap a project
Keep Argilla, compare it with
Keep woodpecker-ci, compare it with