open-wearablesvswoodpecker-ci
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| open-wearables | woodpecker-ci | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 31 in Health & Fitness | #5 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 2 727 | 8 066 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +172 | +158 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 11 |
| Latest release | 0.10.0 · 16 Oct 2026 | v3.20.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
woodpecker-ci scores 73/100 against 63/100 for open-wearables, so it is the safer default.
open-wearables ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for woodpecker-ci.
open-wearables details →woodpecker-ci details →
Swap a project
Keep open-wearables, compare it with
Keep woodpecker-ci, compare it with