ArgillavsUptime-Kuma-Web-API
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Argilla | Uptime-Kuma-Web-API | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 3 in Data Collection | #12 of 13 in API |
| GitHub stars | 5 185 | 282 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +63 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | — |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Argilla scores 64/100 against 39/100 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, so it is the safer default.
Argilla is growing faster right now (+63 stars in 30 days).
Argilla details →Uptime-Kuma-Web-API details →
Swap a project
Keep Argilla, compare it with
Keep Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, compare it with