open-wearablesvsUptime-Kuma-Web-API
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| open-wearables | Uptime-Kuma-Web-API | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 31 in Health & Fitness | #12 of 13 in API |
| GitHub stars | 2 728 | 282 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +166 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 0 |
| Latest release | 0.10.0 · 16 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | — |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
open-wearables scores 63/100 against 39/100 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, so it is the safer default.
open-wearables ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API.
open-wearables is growing faster right now (+166 stars in 30 days).
open-wearables details →Uptime-Kuma-Web-API details →
Swap a project
Keep open-wearables, compare it with
Keep Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, compare it with