ArchiveBoxvsListmonk
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ArchiveBox | Listmonk | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 | 80/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Archiving & Preservation | #1 of 106 in Email |
| GitHub stars | 28 895 | 24 021 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +315 | +469 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 3 |
| Latest release | v0.9.77 · 27 Oct 2026 | v6.2.0 · 26 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Listmonk scores 80/100 against 79/100 for ArchiveBox, so it is the safer default.
ArchiveBox ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for Listmonk.
If you want the quickest setup, ArchiveBox is easier to run; Listmonk needs more configuration.
ArchiveBox details →Listmonk details →
Swap a project
Keep ArchiveBox, compare it with
Keep Listmonk, compare it with