ArchiveBoxvsFish Speech
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ArchiveBox | Fish Speech | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Archiving & Preservation | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 28 898 | 33 462 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +309 | +139 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.9.77 · 27 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
ArchiveBox scores 79/100 against 73/100 for Fish Speech, so it is the safer default.
ArchiveBox ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.
If you want the quickest setup, ArchiveBox is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.
ArchiveBox is growing faster right now (+309 stars in 30 days).
ArchiveBox details →Fish Speech details →
Swap a project
Keep ArchiveBox, compare it with
Keep Fish Speech, compare it with